1. Do you apply any theorethical model in your mediation?
If yes, please, name the model you use
2. See the descriptions below. Which of them is the best representation of your mediating style? Mark 1-2 items.
You assist the parties and their attorneys by pointing out the weaknesses of their cases predicting what a judge would be likely to do. You make recommendations as to the outcome of the issues. You are concerned with the legal rights of the parties rather than interests. You help the parties and attorneys evaluate their legal position and the costs vs. the benefits of pursuing a legal resolution rather than settling in mediation.
You structure a process to assist the parties in reaching a mutually agreeable resolution. You search for interests underneath the positions taken by parties and assist them in finding and analyzing options for resolution. You do not make recommendations - you are in charge of the process, and the parties are in charge of the outcome.
You meet with parties to empower each of the parties as much as possible, and to ensure "recognition" by each of the parties of the other parties' needs, interests, values and points of view. The potential for you is that any or all parties or their relationships may be transformed during the mediation together, since only they can give each other "recognition".
You perceive feelings and emotions as the most important. You make your clients generating options by brainstorming and negotiate their agreement.Your intended outcome is agreement, empowerment, recognition
You define issues mainly through exploring needs concerns and interests. You prefer information gathering over free storytelling. Your intended outcome is agreement.
You prepare the parties for the joint session in private meetings ( define issues and context). During joint sessions you encourage direct dialogue between parties and you try to be as invisible as possible
Instead of focusing on needs, concerns and interests you focus on relations - you allow active listening and free storytelling. You focus on the dominant and alternative discourse elements, deconstructing the conflict-saturated story and change it into reconstruction of an alternative story.
You focus on exploring wants, needs and interests. You work presenting and exchanging data and re-define issues from the newly available data. Your intended outcome is agreement, empowerment and recognition.
3. How would you asses your style of mediation on the scales below ?
directive ---> 1
--- 2
--- 3
-- 4
--- 5
----> non-directive
facilitative ---> 1
--- 2
--- 3
-- 4
--- 5
----> evaluative
many issues raised ---> 1
--- 2
--- 3
-- 4
--- 5
----> one, main issue raised
4. Does your mediation style differ depending on the items below? Choose 1-3 and range them according to their importance.1 stands for "most important", 3 stands for "least important".
type of conflict
subject of mediation
other